Regionalisation is No Silver Bullet for NHS Diagnostic Pressures - but it Must Not Fail

Change HealthcareOpinion Article by Richard Turner, Executive Director, Change Healthcare
In the late 1990s, radiology was a very different place. Still analogue, departments relied on light boxes, and professionals performedmore specific site-based roles. At the time, I worked in the radiology department of a London hospital, and started a change programme with my hospital colleagues to shake up roles.

We taught radiographers to give IV injections, and to do basic nursing care. We started teaching nursing staff to order imaging. And we encouraged radiographers to carry out reporting and procedures likebarium enemas. The sort of approaches we instigated are now common. For example, when a patient goes for a maternity ultrasound today, a midwife might perform the scan. But 20 years ago, we were quite leading edge in the NHS, and even caught the attention of the then prime minister Tony Blair, whoasked me on a visit to ourambulatory care service,'should all hospitals do this?'.

Importantly, we were trying to spread skillsets and to break down boundariesover who's job a task might be. We were also innovating with technology like the hospital's picture archiving and communication system, or PACS, and centralised booking to achieve our aims. This was about focussing care delivery around the patient, rather than the professional or institution. It meant a seamless move for the patient throughout the organisation; that they could access services, professionals and appointments in a single attendance.

Jump forward two decades, and the diagnostic regionalisation agenda now spreading across the NHS, is not so different in ambition. This is just as much about pushing boundaries, spreading skills, and centring services around patient needs.

Care has left the hospital

A lot has progressed since my early NHS days. The digitisation of radiology, for example, has had a big impact on effective reporting, diagnoses and care. The question now being asked is whether technologies and even whether diagnostic disciplines can remain confined to an individual hospital.

In places like Ireland, PACS has already been deployed nationally, with significant positive implications for the ability to report on any patient, regardless of location.

And in England, similar sized populationsare starting to benefit from region-wide PACS that cover multiple trusts to support visionswhere imaging records can be accessed and reported on from any appropriate location, by any appropriate healthcare professional.

Care really has left the confines of the hospital. What we did in the 90s and noughties is long past - and the siloed approaches for institutional diagnostics are no longer relevant for an NHS where greater collaboration is required, and where patients expect their imaging to follow them.

Regionalisation is fundamental to ending institutional level boundaries, and the benefits are so great that the agenda must prevail.

Prioritising: patients, providers, professionals

We are about to witness a major change in access to diagnostic services. Regionalisation will break down care and resource barriers, and by intelligently prioritising workflow across providers, there is an opportunity to deliver the equitable access to professionals and expertise that patients need.

Cancer referrals have a greater chance of being addressed inrequired timeframes. For screening, if your hospital's mammography specialist isn’t available, then there is suddenly a regional number of professionals to draw on. A production level of diagnostics and referral can be maintained with a bigger pool of staff.

For emergency care like a head injury, a clinician in a busy hospital might struggle to findthe radiologist needed. In a region, multiple consultants can review the image, allowing faster diagnosis.

Andregional approaches can inform the best decision on where a patient receives care. Several years agoa patient presented to their hospital with flu-like illness. They had progressive shortness of breath, and pleuritic chest pain. The patient’s imaging was read at another hospital, before the individual was transferred to the region’s specialist centre – the best place to treat eosinophilicpneumonia. Only by working together could the three sites involved identify the illness and the most appropriate response. As diagnostic regionalisation spreads, this collaboration could become far more commonplace in the NHS.

Bigger peer review and regional best practice

An entirely new culture of sharing best practice could be on the horizon, with big implications for improving quality. Regionalisation can enhance expertise in a way that wouldn’totherwise exist.

Through peer support, and knowledge transfer, quality can be driven up regionwide. For instance, when hospital A is performing well at a particular function, can it share its approach with the lower performing hospital B?

Individuals too can benefit enormously from being part of a bigger setting. As data flows across the region, teaching resources can be built from far bigger datasets of a quality not previously seen, with implications for training a highly informed next generation of diagnostic professionals.

Larger peer groups can also allow for better working conditions - not only from the perspective of balancing worklists, but from better access to colleagues. In an ever increasingly pressured NHS environment, healthcare professionals can be slightly less stressed around making the right decision, when they can share peer review to allow validation they are making the right diagnosis for a patient.

Overcoming resistance

The NHS must be careful not to repeat the mistakes of the past around matters like engagement. Staff might ask themselves: "Am I still in control? Am I still the eminent specialist?" But the benefits for these individuals can be huge, with possibilities like home-based reporting, and the potential to play a bigger role across the regional community.

More importantly, in their DNA, professionals are singularly focussed on patient outcomes. When they can see the impact on outcomes from moving to regionalised diagnostics, they will undoubtedly support the ambition.

No silver bullet

A new regionalised landscape has tremendous potential to instil new confidence in the ways illnesses are diagnosed. But the NHS must be careful not to expect regionalisation to solely solve the rising demand and diminishing resource challenge so often cited in discussions.

Will it make a difference to the workload? Quite probably in the shorter term. But demand will continue to rise, and there will come a point where other interventions are needed - whether that is AI or new approaches to prevention, big data and population health.

Regionalisation is not the silver bullet, but for everything it does mean to improving care, it must not be allowed to fail.

Most Popular Now

West Midlands to Digitally Transform Can…

NHS patients throughout the West Midlands are to benefit from a digital pathology programme, designed to help reduce cancer backlogs, transform services, and improve the speed and accuracy of cancer...

AI Transforms Smartwatch ECG Signals int…

A study published in Nature Medicine reports the ability of a smartwatch ECG to accurately detect heart failure in nonclinical environments. Researchers at Mayo Clinic applied artificial intelligence (AI) to...

Siemens Healthineers Splits Fast-Growing…

Siemens Healthineers is splitting its Asia Pacific operations into two to allow both China and the rest of the region to achieve their full potential. China, now its own region...

Siemens Healthineers Presents Two Revolu…

7 Tesla (T) Magnetom Terra.X(1) will offer excellent imaging of even the smallest structures 3T Magnetom Cima.X(2) more than doubles the gradient amplitude(3) AI algorithms which can reduce scanning...

3D Protein Structure Predictions Made by…

In a living being, proteins make up roughly everything: from the molecular machines running every cell's metabolism, to the tip of your hair. Encoded in the DNA, a protein may...

New Group to Advance Digital Twins in He…

EDITH (Ecosystem for Digital Twins in Healthcare) Coordination and Support Action (CSA) - a group made up of numerous internationally renowned research institutions, professional associations, companies, and hospitals of excellence...

Willingness to Use Video Telehealth Incr…

Americans' use and willingness to use video telehealth has increased since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, rising most sharply among Black Americans and people with less education, according to...

Evaluating Use of New AI Technology in D…

Published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, University of Minnesota researchers led a study evaluating federated learning variations for COVID-19 diagnosis in chest x-rays. Federated learning is...

DMEA Call for Papers: Supporting Digital…

25 - 27 April 2023, Berlin, Germany. Health meets digitalisation: from 25 to 27 April 2023 at DMEA - Connecting Digital Health, all actors aiming to promote health IT will be...

Machine Learning can Help Predict Patien…

Predicting which patients will respond well to treatment is a quandary that has plagued the field of cancer immunotherapy for more than four decades. Now, researchers at the Johns Hopkins...

MEDICA 2022 and COMPAMED 2022: Internati…

14 - 17 November 2022, Düsseldorf, Germany. Next week sees the return of the date marked in extra thick outline in many yearly calendars of the international health and medical technology...

MEDICA and COMPAMED Present Themselves a…

14 - 17 November 2022, Düsseldorf, Germany. MEDICA and COMPAMED continue to develop in an extremely vital manner. The world's leading medical trade fair and the international No. 1 for the...