Final Study Report: Sources of Financing and Policy Recommendations on Boosting eHealth Investment

Sources of Financing and Policy Recommendations to Member States and the European Commission on Boosting eHealth InvestmentThe Financing eHealth study was commissioned by DG INFSO and Media's ICT for Health Unit. The aim is to assess different financing opportunities against the financing needs of eHealth investment. The overriding goal of the study, and of this final report, is to assist Member States and the European Commission (EC) in their efforts to meet the eHealth Action Plan objective of "supporting and boosting investment in eHealth".

A sobering conclusion of the study is that just increasing finance for eHealth will not necessarily boost investment. How much to spend is the wrong question and conveys an inappropriate perspective. What to spend the money spent on is a better question. The most important part of eHealth investment that needs expanding is the eHealth skills and knowledge of healthcare staff and ICT suppliers' staff. An expanded capability is essential to achieve more success and so help to boost eHealth investment.

Increased capability helps to secure the potential and confidence that eHealth will add enough value. If an investment is worth it, providing the required finance becomes a supporting priority. Denying finance for eHealth is the right decision where the planned investment does not show a better net benefit than other types of competing investment. Choosing the best financing arrangement is a challenge for eHealth investors. A common theme seems to be the difficulty in integrating eHealth financing into the factors that ensure success. Over-emphasising finance for ICT to the detriment of engagement, change, and benefits realisation may be prevalent, and needs correcting.

No single source of financing is enough to initiate an eHealth investment and see it through to its completion. Mixed financing arrangements are a solution to handle such investments at all stages of their lifecycle. This applies to both recurring and nonrecurring costs. Joint financing for recurring costs is a model in which all beneficiaries have to be involved in the financing stage. Current financing opportunities support a limited, and often insufficient, time-period of the investment lifecycle. Therefore a combination of sources is suitable to support an investment, and its characteristics determine the finance mix. Often, different models of eHealth financing need combining to procure such investments.

Download Sources of Financing and Policy Recommendations to Member States and the European Commission on Boosting eHealth Investment Final study report (.pdf, 847 KB).

Download from the eHealthNews.EU Portal's mirror: Sources of Financing and Policy Recommendations to Member States and the European Commission on Boosting eHealth Investment Final study report (.pdf, 847 KB).

For further information, please visit:
http://www.financing-ehealth.eu

Related news articles:

About empirica
empirica Gesellschaft für Kommunikations- und Technologieforschung mbH (empirica) has many years of experience in quantitative and qualitative research methods. Its clients are private companies and public bodies: large and medium-sized companies in the insurance, pharmaceutical and automobile industries as well as software developers and hardware manufacturers. There are also telecommunications service companies and network providers, social services firms, medical facilities, Federal and State Government ministries in Germany and the European Commission as well as the European statistical office (Eurostat). For further information, please visit www.empirica.com.

About Financing eHealth study
The Financing eHealth study was commissioned by DG INFSO and Media, unit ICT for Health, with the aim to assess different financing opportunities against the financing needs of eHealth investment. The overriding goal is to provide assistance to Member States and the European Commission in their efforts to meet the eHealth Action Plan objective of "supporting and boosting investment in eHealth".

The study focuses on providing insights and specific recommendations on:

  • developing the supply side of eHealth finance to optimise the use of resources available for boosting investment in eHealth, including ways to add value through collaboration between Member States;
  • effective and efficient management of eHealth investment to support health services providers, i.e. the demand side.

These recommendations aim to help close the gap between supply of and demand for eHealth financing, and thus support Member States and the European Commission in their activities.

For further information, please visit http://www.financing-ehealth.eu.

Most Popular Now

Unlocking the 10 Year Health Plan

The government's plan for the NHS is a huge document. Jane Stephenson, chief executive of SPARK TSL, argues the key to unlocking its digital ambitions is to consider what it...

Alcidion Grows Top Talent in the UK, wit…

Alcidion has today announced the addition of three new appointments to their UK-based team, with one internal promotion and two external recruits. Dr Paul Deffley has been announced as the...

AI can Find Cancer Pathologists Miss

Men assessed as healthy after a pathologist analyses their tissue sample may still have an early form of prostate cancer. Using AI, researchers at Uppsala University have been able to...

New Training Year Starts at Siemens Heal…

In September, 197 school graduates will start their vocational training or dual studies in Germany at Siemens Healthineers. 117 apprentices and 80 dual students will begin their careers at Siemens...

AI, Full Automation could Expand Artific…

Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems such as the UVA Health-developed artificial pancreas could help more type 1 diabetes patients if the devices become fully automated, according to a new review...

How AI could Speed the Development of RN…

Using artificial intelligence (AI), MIT researchers have come up with a new way to design nanoparticles that can more efficiently deliver RNA vaccines and other types of RNA therapies. After training...

MIT Researchers Use Generative AI to Des…

With help from artificial intelligence, MIT researchers have designed novel antibiotics that can combat two hard-to-treat infections: drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae and multi-drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Using generative AI algorithms, the research...

AI Hybrid Strategy Improves Mammogram In…

A hybrid reading strategy for screening mammography, developed by Dutch researchers and deployed retrospectively to more than 40,000 exams, reduced radiologist workload by 38% without changing recall or cancer detection...

Penn Developed AI Tools and Datasets Hel…

Doctors treating kidney disease have long depended on trial-and-error to find the best therapies for individual patients. Now, new artificial intelligence (AI) tools developed by researchers in the Perelman School...

Are You Eligible for a Clinical Trial? C…

A new study in the academic journal Machine Learning: Health discovers that ChatGPT can accelerate patient screening for clinical trials, showing promise in reducing delays and improving trial success rates. Researchers...

Global Study Reveals How Patients View M…

How physicians feel about artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has been studied many times. But what do patients think? A team led by researchers at the Technical University of Munich...

New AI Tool Addresses Accuracy and Fairn…

A team of researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai has developed a new method to identify and reduce biases in datasets used to train machine-learning algorithms...